Skip to main content
· 4/9/1975

Kamensky v. Stacey

Citations

  • 215 S.E.2d 294
  • 134 Ga. App. 530
  • 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the complaining party cannot legitimately claim surprise, it is not error to fail to invoke the sanction of postponement or barring the witness
  • “[W]here the complaining party cannot legitimately claim surprise, either because he knew of the existence of the witness or had equal means of knowing, it is not error to fail to invoke the sanctions of postponement, mistrial, barring the witness, etc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webb, Bell, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.