Kamauris Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the scope of the writ has been broadened in modern times to claims of both legal and factual error, but only in criminal cases”
• explaining that a district court’s “power to hear a petition for the writ [of coram nobis] derives from the statute conferring subject-matter jurisdiction in the original criminal case’
• alleged error in defendant’s sentence is not fundamental because it “doesn’t cast doubt on [the defendant’s] guilt”
• alleged error in defendant’s sentence is not fundamental because it “doesn’t cast doubt on [the defendant’s] guilt”
• alleged error in defendant’s sentence is not fundamental because it “doesn’t cast doubt on [the defendant’s] guilt”
• alleged error in defendant’s sentence is not fundamental because it “doesn’t cast doubt on [the defendant’s] guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).