Skip to main content
· 4/5/1991

Kamasinski v. Rubin

Citations

  • 764 F. Supp. 741
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7615
  • 1991 WL 94383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the plaintiff engaged in protected activity when she “filed [an] EEOC charge complaining of gender discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.