Kamal v. Imroz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in restricting a child's travel out of the country because father once took the child out of state without informing the mother
• recognizing that district court has discretion to determine best interests of child, that parenting plan shall serve best interests, and finding no abuse of discretion with regard to parenting plan
• joint decisionmaking by parents not in child’s best interests when parents are unable to communicate face-to-face and there is level of distrust
• joint decisionmaking by parents not in child’s best interests when parents unable to communicate face-to-face and have level of distrust
• joint decisionmaking by parents not -9- in child’s best interests when parents are unable to communicate face-to-face and there is level of distrust
• joint decisionmaking by parents not in child’s best interests when parents are unable to communicate face-to-face and there is a level of distrust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).