Kalsi v. New York City Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that permitting an employee to work without a hardhat would increase the employer’s risk of liability
• “Where . . . the proposed accommodation threatens to compromise safety in the workplace, the employer’s burden of establishing an undue burden is light indeed.”
• “[I]n stark contrast to the ADA’s reasonable accommodation requirement, which has been interpreted broadly, the obligation under Title VII is very slight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).