Skip to main content
· 12/17/2013

Kalpoe v. Super. Ct. 1217/13 CA2/7

Citations

  • 222 Cal. App. 4th 206
  • 166 Cal. Rptr. 3d 80

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding application of statutory limitation to scope of damages evidence in support of claims including defamation per se in case involving television program, where retraction was not demanded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.