Kalo v. Moen Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus, despite Kalo’s artful attempt to style the third claim as a violation of Ohio public policy, it necessarily arises’under § 1140 [§ 510] and, accordingly, the enforcement provisions of § 1132 [§ 502]”
• termination in violation of Ohio public policy based on benefits-defeating motive pre-empted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).