Kallam v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Subsection 74.251 is the current version of Section 10.01
• deferring decision on issue until it had been fully litigated below “‘so that we will have the benefit of developed arguments on both sides and lower court opinions squarely addressing the question’ ”( quoting Yee v. City of Escondido , 503 U.S. 519, 538 (1992))
• “If a movant does establish that the statute of limitations bars the action, the nonmovant must then adduce summary judgment proof raising a fact issue in avoidance of the statute of limitations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).