· 6/30/2005
Kalkhorst v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Citations
- 375 F. Supp. 2d 1079
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17146
- 2005 WL 1539192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting idea that “no harm, no foul” shows pretext where employee violated company policy but nothing resulted from that violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.