Skip to main content
· 6/30/2005

Kalkhorst v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 375 F. Supp. 2d 1079
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17146
  • 2005 WL 1539192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting idea that “no harm, no foul” shows pretext where employee violated company policy but nothing resulted from that violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.