Skip to main content
· 7/12/2005

Kalinoski v. Evans

Citations

  • 377 F. Supp. 2d 136
  • 67 Fed. R. Serv. 874
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13858
  • 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 175
  • 2005 WL 1653569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (as well as Federal Rule of Evidence 501) prevent a State from directing a federal court with regard to the evidence it may order produced in the adjudication of a federal claim.”
  • “it does not follow from the fact that a patient is not allowed to inspect her own notes under section 164.524(a)(1)® that a court order plus a patient authorization are insufficient to permit the production of notes in a court proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.