Kalfas v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “although the easement’s provisions are exceptionally broad, they are also clear and unambiguous, so the trial court should not have relied on the circumstances surrounding the document’s execution to determine the meaning of ‘existing roads’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stimson Lumber Company v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2020-05-08
• Farrar v. City of Newberg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-29

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tipperman v. Tsiatsos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-10-02· cited 32×
• Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et Ux
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-12-23· cited 31×
• Bloomfield v. Weakland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 24×
• Kell v. Oppenlander
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-10· cited 18×
• Ericsson v. Braukman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-01-22· cited 18×
• Clark v. Kuhn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-15· cited 17×
• Hammond v. Hammond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-07· cited 12×
• Tooker v. Feinstein
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-14· cited 10×
• Knight v. Nyara
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-16· cited 10×
• Stonier v. Kronenberger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-29· cited 6×
• In re the Marriage of Uwimana
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13· cited 6×
• Wagner v. O'Callaghan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-07· cited 5×