Kalenka v. Infinity Insurance Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding for insurer because policy did not cover stabbing and killing by uninsured driver after minor collision
• “[W]here a clause in an insurance policy is ambiguous in the sense that it is reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation, we accept the interpretation that most favors the insured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).