Skip to main content
· 1/13/1999

Kalchthaler v. Keller Construction Co.

Citations

  • 591 N.W.2d 169
  • 224 Wis. 2d 387
  • 1999 Wisc. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CGL policy granted coverage for property damage to contractor's completed work and that the exclusion for property damage to the insured's work did not apply because an exception to the exclusion restored coverage if the work was performed by a subcontractor
  • reviewing insurance industry publications stating that the subcontractor exception results in coverage if the work out of which the damage arose was performed by the insured's subcontractor
  • reviewing insurance industry publications stating that the subcontractor exception results in coverage if the work out of which the damage arose was performed by the insured's subcontractor
  • finding water damage to interior of building from defectively installed window was an \occurrence\
  • \The only reasonable reading of this exception is that it restores coverage to completed work caused by the work of a subcontractor.\
  • where faulty workmanship that resulted in water entering leaky windows and wrecking drapery and wallpaper considered occurrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Nettesheim, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.