Skip to main content
· 1/14/2004

Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Rockwell International Corporation and Eaton Corporation

Citations

  • 355 F.3d 574
  • 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20013
  • 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1115
  • 57 ERC (BNA) 1865
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Money judgments, however, do not generally have prospective application because they are final in the sense of involving a set monetary outlay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Gilman, Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.