· 1/14/2004
Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Rockwell International Corporation and Eaton Corporation
Citations
- 355 F.3d 574
- 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20013
- 57 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1115
- 57 ERC (BNA) 1865
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Money judgments, however, do not generally have prospective application because they are final in the sense of involving a set monetary outlay.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Gilman, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.