Kalamazoo Oil Co. v. Boerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is within the trial court's discretion whether to allow a defendant who defaulted for discovery sane- tions to introduce evidence of comparative fault
• holding that it is within the trial court’s discretion whether to allow a defendant who defaulted for discovery sanctions to introduce evidence of comparative fault
• holding that it is within the trial court’s discretion whether to allow a defendant who defaulted for discovery sanctions to introduce evidence of comparative fault
• holding that it is within the trial court’s discretion whether to allow a defendant who defaulted for discovery sanctions to introduce evidence of comparative fault
• recognizing that the court rules authorize the dismissal of a claim as a sanction against individuals who fails to obey orders to provide discovery
• concluding that a trial court may enter a default judgment against a defendant as a sanction for discovery abuses, such as failure to comply with discovery orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).