Kalamath Investment Co. v. Asphalt Paving Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The existence of a [mechanics’] lien ... is not presumed ... [the claimant must] show that he has complied with all of the essential requirements of the statute under which he claims.” (quoting 57 C.J.S. Mechanics’ Liens § 308)
• \The existence of a [mechanics'] lien ... is not presumed ... [the claimant must] show that he has complied with all of the essential requirements of the statute under which he claims. \ (quoting 57 C.J.S. Mechanics' Liens § 308)
• record disclosed no compliance with lis pendens requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).