Skip to main content
· 4/1/1982

Kakas v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 65 Pa. Commw. 550
  • 442 A.2d 1243
  • 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting jurisdictional discovery based on evidence L’Oréal S.A. may have researched and developed products that it may license
  • “[W]e must look at the ordinary meaning in the context of . . . the prosecution history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatt, Doyle, Mencer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.