· 4/1/1982
Kakas v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 65 Pa. Commw. 550
- 442 A.2d 1243
- 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting jurisdictional discovery based on evidence L’Oréal S.A. may have researched and developed products that it may license
- “[W]e must look at the ordinary meaning in the context of . . . the prosecution history.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatt, Doyle, Mencer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.