Skip to main content
· 6/5/1981

Kajiya v. Department of Water Supply

Citations

  • 629 P.2d 635
  • 2 Haw. App. 221
  • 1981 Haw. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “if the evidence presented on the motion is subject to conflicting interpretations, or reasonable men [and women] might differ as to its significance, summary judgment is improper”
  • some brackets in the original; citation and internal block quote format omitted
  • “[A] human’s property ... may include his pet fish.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hayashi, Burns, Shintaku, Place, Padgett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.