Kajita v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not error to refuse disclosure of a confidential informant where it was claimed the informant was an active participant or eye witness where there was no showing that the informant’s testimony was “material”
• noted controversy but assumed without deciding that double jeopardy could apply in some circumstances to imposition of an enhanced sentence
• omission of informant’s claimed criminal participation in heroin delivery was not material to a finding of probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).