Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[c]omplaints generally incorporate prior allegations into subsequent causes of action” and rejecting argument that entire complaint should have been stricken once court struck claims that had been incorporated (continued...
• “The submission of contractual claims for payment in the regular course of business before the commencement of litigation simply is not an act in furtherance of the right of petition or free speech within the meaning of the anti-SLAPP statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).