Kaiser v. Metropolitan Util. Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he three to four-minute delay between the shooting and first descriptive statements did not destroy the necessary contemporaneity.”
• “Under Rule 803(1), a 20 The Court notes that the statement would not be admissible as an excited utterance under Fed. R. Evid. 803(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).