Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation v. Marshland Dredging Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying recovery where owner of production plant suffered losses from interruption of gas services due to damage to another owner’s pipeline
• manufacturer suffered economic damages when heavy anchor was dropped and punctured gas pipeline, interrupting gas service to manufacturer's plant
• “We agree that recovery by Kaiser is precluded as a matter of law because there is . . . no contention that the interference with Kaiser’s contract rights was intentional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).