· 7/22/1920
Kahepu v. King
Citations
- 25 Haw. 577
- 1920 Haw. LEXIS 25
Syllabus
<p>Appeal and Error — assignment of errors — sufficiency.</p> <p>An assignment of error general in its nature and indefinite is not sufficient and will not be considered.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Secretary’s brief was returned where it was not timely filed and the Court remanded the appeal based upon the record.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coke, Edings, Kemp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.