Skip to main content
· 3/31/2011

Kagan v. Unum Provident

Citations

  • 775 F. Supp. 2d 659
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40098
  • 2011 WL 1325982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • detailing continued payment of disability benefits under ERISA plan notwithstanding incarceration
  • “[T]he SSA’s determination that [the plaintiff] was entitled to SSDI benefits rested entirely on [the plaintiffs] condition in 1999, which is not at issue in this action.”
  • “the statutory definition of “disability” [for social security] is not binding on the interpretation of an ERISA plan’s definition of the term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenneth M. Karas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.