· 3/31/2011
Kagan v. Unum Provident
Citations
- 775 F. Supp. 2d 659
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40098
- 2011 WL 1325982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- detailing continued payment of disability benefits under ERISA plan notwithstanding incarceration
- “[T]he SSA’s determination that [the plaintiff] was entitled to SSDI benefits rested entirely on [the plaintiffs] condition in 1999, which is not at issue in this action.”
- “the statutory definition of “disability” [for social security] is not binding on the interpretation of an ERISA plan’s definition of the term.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kenneth M. Karas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.