Kaftan v. Siegel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that civil rights plaintiffs may “raise important issues” that “test the boundaries of our laws” and spur “pro- gress”
• “[I]t is incumbent upon the losing party to demonstrate why the costs should not be awarded.”
• denying “extraordinarily high” $46,710.97 cost bill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).