Skip to main content
· 7/19/1996

Kafack v. Primerica Life Insurance

Citations

  • 934 F. Supp. 3
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Maryland had a compelling interest in adjudicating local dispute
  • finding that the accessibility factor favored transfer to Maryland given that the majority of witnesses and records were located there
  • finding no meaningful ties to the District of Columbia where “the material events that constitute the factual predicate for the plaintiffs claims” occurred in Maryland
  • noting Maryland’s close proximity to the District of Columbia and the fact that “the courthouse in Greenbelt is ... within one mile of a Metro Station”
  • stating in support of a transfer that “the material events that constitute the factual predicate for the plaintiff’s claims occurred” in the transferee district

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.