Kaevion Raqeem Sanders v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was nothing ambiguous about the indictment where it alleged defendant obtained \United States money\
• “[T]he difference [between the Hartness line and the Diaz line] is whether the two underlying acts are separate offenses or whether they are merely alternative ways to establish a single offense.”
• defendant abandoned argument that his right to be present at all stages of trial was violated where record reveals that defendant raised objection for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).