· 2/26/1932
Kaercher v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Ortonville
Citations
- 57 F.2d 58
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he rigorousness of our inquiry depends upon the extent to which the challenged law burdens plaintiffs’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”
- strict scrutiny not applied to exclusion of circulators under the age of eighteen in part because it was a temporary disability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reeves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.