Kaeo v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court has inherent as well as express statutory authority “to punish for contempt”
• explaining that the Court should exercise \restraint and discretion\ when considering sanctions
• ordering Secretary to pay as sanction at EAJA rates petitioner’s expenses and reimbursement for “professional time invested” in preparing second extraordinary-relief petition
• Court “must take care to determine that the conduct at issue actually abused the judicial process.”
• where Secretary had failed to correct false statement before Court, Court ordered, pursuant to contempt authority, sanctions in form of expenses and attorney fees
• Court has power to sanction those who abuse judicial process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).