Kadar Corp. v. Mary H. Milbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specific facts in support of an allegation of bad faith need to be stated where the official action challenged is unexceptional on its face
• overt acts committed outside statutory limitation period are not actionable even if they are part of a continuing conspiracy that included overt acts within limitation period
• overt acts committed outside statutory limitation period are not actionable even if they are part of a continuing conspiracy that included overt acts within limitation period
• “nowhere is there so much as a hint as to what, specifically, any of the .• . . [defendants] are supposed to have done” in connection with the alleged conspiracy
• G.L.c. 260, §2Abars actions commenced over tico years after acts which occurred in 1971 and 1972, unless for some reason it could be found that a cause of action based on those acts did not accrue until sometime later

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).