Skip to main content
· 1/3/1958

Kachman v. Blosberg

Citations

  • 251 Minn. 224
  • 87 N.W.2d 687
  • 1958 Minn. LEXIS 545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating statutory provision “cannot be read out of context but must be taken together with other related provisions to determine its meaning”
  • affirming judgment after concluding that negligence was a factual issue for the jury when a child was hit while crossing the highway without yielding to oncoming traffic
  • affirming judgment after concluding that negligence was a factual issue for the jury when a child was hit while crossing the highway without yielding to oncoming traffic
  • \a particular provision of a statute cannot be read out of context but must be taken together with other related provisions to determine its meaning\
  • statutory provision “cannot be read out of context but must be taken together with other related provisions to determine its meaning”
  • “We are to read and construe a statute as a whole and must interpret each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.