Skip to main content
· 7/17/2007

Kacak v. Bank Calumet, N.A.

Citations

  • 869 N.E.2d 1239
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 1576
  • 2007 WL 2034431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a claim for promissory estoppel based on a bank’s promise that a check “was good,” rather than a 16 No. 22-2708 written agreement, before withdrawing money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Robb, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.