Kabushiki Kaisha Hattori Seiko v. Refac Technology Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “this disputed fact is not material to resolving the issues presented by these motions”
• interpreting settlement agreement to bar patentee Refac from suing purchasers of goods from Hattori
• interpreting settlement agreement to bar patentee Refac from suing purchasers of goods from Hattori

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).