Kabir v. Virginia State Board of Medicine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that plaintiffs “optimistic” sales projections that were expected to increase in subsequent years were “speculative and remote” and did not show that irreparable harm was likely
• determining that “‘concern’ among major retailers” and “decisions adverse to [plaintiff] after meeting with [defendant’s] representatives” did not meet “the requisite showing that its lost sales or opportunities will amount to irreparable injury”
• stating that a movant for a preliminary injunction must show “(1) likelihood of success on the merits; (2) likelihood that the moving party will suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is not granted; (3
• “the ‘burden of proof and persuasion rests squarely’ on the party moving for a preliminary injunction to show that irreparable harm is likely”
• “the ‘burden of proof and persuasion rests squarely’ on the party moving for a preliminary injunction to show that irreparable harm is likely”
• “the moving party must first demonstrate that irreparable harm would be ‘likely’ in the absence of a preliminary injunction ‘before the other requirements for the issuance of [a preliminary] injunction will be considered.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).