Kabella v. Bouschelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a minor plaintiff could not sue another minor for mere negligence for injuries sustained in an informal game of tackle football; a viable claim must be predicated upon reckless or intentional conduct
• adopting a \reckless or wilful conduct\ standard for contact sports in a case involving an informal tackle football game
• adopting a “reckless or wilful conduct” standard for contact sports in a case involving an informal tackle footbaU game
• basing imposition of recklessness standard on implied-consent theory but noting that participation in contact sports does not constitute consent to contact prohibited by safety rules
• disallowing claim for negligence in injury in recreational football game, relying on Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 931 (1979
• disallowing claim for negligence in injury in recreational football game, relying on Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 931 (1979

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).