Kabealo v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• splitting state claims from federal claims \would result in a needless duplication of expense and judicial resources\
• splitting state claims from federal claims “would result in a needless duplication of expense and judicial resources”
• “The use of different counts to plead different legal theories or multiple theories of recovery does not automatically make those counts separate and independent.”
• Section 1367 “contains no express language which would permit this court to decline to exercise jurisdiction” over a properly removed federal claim.
• RICO and state law claims were not \separate and independent” under section 1441(c) because \plaintiff relie[d] on tire same recitation of facts for all counts of the complaint”.
• “This Court concludes that the phrase “matters in which State law predominates” does not authorize the remand of claims arising under federal law which are properly removed and which fall within the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• No. 94-3025
  Third Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 469×
• Stemler v. City of Florence
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-10-08· cited 377×
• In Re City of Mobile
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-01-31· cited 49×
• Padilla v. City of Saginaw
  E.D. Michigan· 1994-11-15· cited 47×
• City of New Rochelle v. Town of Mamaroneck
  S.D. New York· 2000-08-24· cited 29×
• Salei v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-01-23· cited 23×
• Hickerson v. City of New York
  S.D. New York· 1996-06-27· cited 17×
• Burnett v. Birmingham Board of Education
  N.D. Alabama· 1994-08-15· cited 7×
• Doll v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 2000-03-09· cited 6×
• Majeske v. Bay City Board of Education
  E.D. Michigan· 2001-12-27· cited 6×
• Hunter Ex Rel. Conyer v. Estate of Baecher
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-11-20· cited 4×
• Broad, Vogt & Conant, Inc. v. Alsthom Automation, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2002-02-25· cited 4×
• Stephens v. LJ PARTNERS
  W.D. Texas· 1994-05-17· cited 3×
• Porter v. Roosa
  S.D. Ohio· 2003-01-14· cited 3×
• Lujan v. Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc.
  D. New Mexico· 1999-03-02· cited 3×
• McGilvray v. Hallmark Financial Group, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-07-06· cited 2×
• Cheney v. Studstrup
  D. Utah· 1998-09-30· cited 2×
• City of Mobile, In Re:
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-01-31
• Unnamed case
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-11-13

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
  Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 9,468×
• American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
• Tafflin v. Levitt
  Supreme Court· 1990-03-19· cited 634×
• Moore v. DeBiase
  D. New Jersey· 1991-06-20· cited 46×
• Union Planters National Bank of Memphis v. Cbs, Inc., Stax Records, Inc., Alvertis Isbell, A/K/A Al Bell, and James F. Stewart
  Sixth Circuit· 1977-06-21· cited 43×
• Alexander by Alexander v. Goldome Credit Corp.
  M.D. Alabama· 1991-07-10· cited 39×
• Holland v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.
  N.D. Alabama· 1991-05-21· cited 29×
• Moralez v. Meat Cutters Local 539
  E.D. Michigan· 1991-12-13· cited 24×
• Administaff, Inc. v. Kaster
  W.D. Texas· 1992-07-22· cited 17×
• DiAntonio v. Pennsylvania State University
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-08-30· cited 14×
• Clark v. Milam
  S.D. West Virginia· 1993-02-12· cited 14×
• Bodenner v. Graves
  W.D. Michigan· 1993-07-29· cited 14×
• Griffin v. Ford Consumer Finance Co.
  W.D. North Carolina· 1993-01-21· cited 7×
• Gallagher v. Donald
  S.D. New York· 1992-10-15· cited 7×