Kabadian v. Doak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[w]e adopt the reasoning and holding of Joe v. United States”
• adopting “the reasoning and holding of Joe” without expressly construing the legislative history to apply only to federal statutes
• “There is no mention of waiver of sovereign immunity in the only section of the FTCA that mentions attorneys’ fees. Such a waiver will not be inferred.”
• omitting any independent analysis while adopting Joe’s holding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).