K & S Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Cheng

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ “acted within his discretion in according [an opinion] little weight” because it was based on the claimant’s “subjective complaints about his mental limitations”
• finding that the ALJ’s decision was “further supported by the ALJ’s personal observation of [the claimant] during the hearing”
• finding that an ALJ “acted within his discretion in according [a] doctor[’]s[] reports little weight” because the ALJ determined the doctor’s “assessment was based on . . . [claimant’s] subjective complaints”
• finding that an ALJ “acted within h[er] discretion in according [a] doctor[’]s[] reports little weight” because the ALJ determined the doctor’s “assessment was based on . . . [claimants] subjective complaints” and “was internally inconsistent”
• finding ALJ properly discounted doctor’s findings when they were based on the “unreliable foundation” of plaintiff’s unsupported allegations
• ALJ properly discounted doctor’s findings when findings were based on the “unreliable foundation” of claimant’s unsupported allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).