K. Kay Shearin v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Tucker Act limits this court's jurisdiction to \cases not sounding in tort\
• observing that “[t]he CJA . . . is silent as to availability of appellate review where a circuit court has denied payment of attorney fees sought under the CJA.”
• explaining it is “well settled that the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks. . . jurisdiction to entertain tort claims”
• rejecting plaintiff’s attempt to sustain a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act
• “It is well settled that the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks . . . jurisdiction to entertain tort claims.”
• \It is well settled that the [Court of Federal Claims] lacks ... jurisdiction to entertain tort claims.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).