K. Hefner, Inc. v. Caremark, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where two statutes appear to apply to an issue, the more specific statute should control over the general statute
• dismissing plaintiffs without adverse consequences is beneficial because “it would tend to encourage parties who do not ‘have the stomach’ for litigation to seek a dismissal”
• dismissing plaintiffs without adverse consequences is beneficial because \it would tend to encourage parties who do not `have the stomach' for litigation to seek a dismissal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).