K & G ABATEMENT CO. v. Keil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to apply the unexplained death presumption to cases where a claimant was found alive would “significantly alter[] the jurisprudence of workers’ compensation law” and therefore “is more properly a matter of policy, a prerogative of the legislative branch of government”
• “The actual determination of causation is a factual finding that will not be disturbed on appeal, if supported by credible evidence.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• applying harmless error review to a decision of the Commission
• applying harmless error review to a decision of the Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).