Skip to main content
· 8/21/1991

K. Dale Wissman, Sheryll Wissman v. Pittsburgh National Bank

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 867
  • 25 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 605
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19225
  • 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1697
  • 1991 WL 158850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adding that “claiming a specific dollar exemption” for a cause of action “is, at best, speculation”
  • adding that “claiming a specific dollar exemption” for a cause of action “is, at best, speculation”
  • stating that any party in interest may object to claimed exemptions
  • Debtors’ cause of action reverted back to them because they listed it on their schedules, claimed it as exempt, and no party in interest raised an objection.
  • “We do not agree . . . that by claiming [as exempt] a value less than the statutory maximum, or no value at all, as in this case, the entire property becomes exempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Hill, Eleventh, Boyle, Eastern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.