J.W.T. v. S.T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he question as to whether a particular piece of property is personalty or a fixture is a question of fact”
• “The question as to whether a particular piece of property is personalty or a fixture is a question of fact.”
• Connecticut courts “construe pleadings broadly and realistically, rather than narrowly and technically . . . [in order to] do substantial justice between the parties” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).