Skip to main content

Citations

  • 146 Haw. 581
  • 463 P.3d 1238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the \clearly erroneous\ standard to conclusions of law that present mixed questions of fact and law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.