Juvenal v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that automobile searches are permissible where \(1) the police have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence of a criminal offense; and (2) the circumstances giving rise to probable cause are unforeseeable and spontaneous\
• denying suppression of evidence discovered during a warrantless automobile search because the officer smelled raw marijuana
• noting Witt \announced . . . a sharp departure from a more narrow construction of the automobile exception the Court had previously adopted\
• \[I]t is not our role as an intermediate appellate court to engraft upon [a New Jersey Supreme Court decision] an exception that was not expressed in the Court's detailed majority opinion.\
• similarly yielding to the Supreme Court in fashioning new constitutional principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).