Jutte Elec., Ltd. v. Ohio Facilities Constr. Comm.

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 2697

Syllabus

Objection Civ.R. 53 construction surety contract. The court found that the referee accurately applied the law as it pertained to plaintiffs' burden of proof, and the referee's analysis of the effect of an MOU on plaintiffs' claims was an accurate interpretation. Also, the court agreed with the referee that plaintiffs' Article 8 claim was not timely. The court adopted the referee's decision and recommendation as its own, including conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment rendered in favor of defendant.