Just's Admr. v. Woodman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Forest Service’s contention that there is no method to predict the impact of one project’s GHG emissions on climate change because “a tool is and was available: the social cost of carbon protocol”
• \It is arbitrary to offer detailed projections of a project's upside while omitting a feasible projection of the project's costs.\ (citations omitted)
• “Any post-hoc 10 rationalizations provided by the agencies in this litigation are irrelevant to the 11 question of whether the agencies complied with NEPA at the time they made their 12 respective decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).