JustMed, Inc. v. Byce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 16 federal question jurisdiction exists if cases require application of the work-for-hire doctrine
• explaining that the “central inquiry” is “the hiring party’s right to control the manner and means by which the product is accomplished” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Under the artful pleading rule ‘a plaintiff may not defeat removal by omitting to plead necessary federal questions in a complaint.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Detrice Garmon v. County of Los Angeles
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-07-05· cited 245×
• Woods v. Resnick
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2010-08-18· cited 52×
• United States v. City of Arcata
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-12-17· cited 36×
• Agency Solutions.Com, LLC v. Trizetto Group, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2011-09-13· cited 36×
• Bombardier Inc. v. Mitsubishi Aircraft Corp.
  W.D. Washington· 2019-04-15· cited 31×
• GCB Communications, Inc. v. U.S. South Communications, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-04-29· cited 30×
• Experian Information Solutions v. Nationwide Marketing Services
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 19×
• TransUnion Risk & Alternative Data Solutions, Inc. v. Best One, Inc. (In re TLFO, LLC)
  S.D. Florida· 2016-08-18· cited 7×
• Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 6×
• Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-02-26· cited 5×
• Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc. v. Dowell
  E.D. Missouri· 2013-01-23· cited 5×
• Swipe & Bite, Inc. v. Chow
  N.D. California· 2015-11-23· cited 4×
• Oliver v. Johanson
  S.D. New York· 2018-11-21· cited 4×
• Russell v. BSN MEDICAL, INC.
  W.D. North Carolina· 2010-06-11· cited 3×
• Regents of the University of California v. Aisen
  S.D. California· 2015-10-29· cited 1×
• Oliver v. Johanson
  S.D. New York· 2018-06-29· cited 1×
• U.S. Vinyl Manufacturing Corp. v. Colour & Design, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2013-09-26
• Miranda Stovall v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ.
  Sixth Circuit· 2026-01-14

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 5,652×
• Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
• Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Darden
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,334×
• Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 1,141×
• Arco Environmental Remediation, L.L.C. v. Department Of Health And Environmental Quality Of The State Of Montana
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-05-24· cited 739×
• National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of America
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-06· cited 451×
• T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1964-12-23· cited 393×
• Omnitech International, Inc. v. Clorox Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-01-26· cited 212×
• Clifford Scott Aymes v. Jonathan Bonelli, Doing Business as Island Swimming Sales, Inc. And Island Recreational
  Second Circuit· 1992-12-02· cited 99×
• Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-06-26· cited 64×
• Michael J. Topolos v. Jeffrey Caldewey, an Individual Dba Vintage Image, Robert Titus, Richard Paul Hinkle, an Individual and Does I Through M
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-02-08· cited 57×
• Scandinavian Satellite System, AS v. Prime TV Ltd.
  D.C. Circuit· 2002-06-04· cited 41×
• Compuware Corp. v. Serena Software International, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1999-11-30· cited 32×
• Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-03· cited 30×
• Ron and Judy Kirk, Doing Business as Iowa Pedigree v. Gary Harter
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-10-13· cited 26×
• GME, INC. v. Carter
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1996-05-24· cited 3×