Justine Justus Okot v. William L. Callahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district judge should have remanded case because “Okot, as the petitioner in 15 the state court proceeding, had no power to remove his own case. Removal is available only to 16 defendants. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(c), 1442, 1443, 1446(c
• holding that 6 district judge should have remanded case because “Okot, as the petitioner in the state court 7 proceeding, had no power to remove his own case. Removal is available only to defendants. 28 8 U.S.C. §§ 1441(c), 1442, 1443, 1446(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).