JUSTIN STUEVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for causation, it must be established that the act subject to the plaintiff’s attack occurred while performing official duties
• holding that “one of the most important reasons for removal is to have the validity of the defense of official immunity tried in a federal court”
• holding that federal court has jurisdiction over a case properly removed under § 1442(a)(1) “regardless of whether the suit could originally have been brought in a federal court”
• holding that federal court has jurisdiction over a case properly removed under § 1442(a)(1) “regardless of whether the suit could originally have been brought in a federal court”
• holding that “[t]he federal officer removal statute is not ‘narrow’ or ‘limited’ ”
• holding that “[t]he federal officer removal statute is not ‘narrow’ or ‘limited’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).